WASHINGTON — President Trump spent much of Thursday playing up his economic accomplishments and attacking his regular list of rivals, including Hillary Clinton and the news media, which he again called the enemy of the people.
As he tried to leave in his wake Monday’s news conference with President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia, analysts and critics spent the day wondering whether the misstep would create a lasting problem for him.
As they ruminated, supporters who had publicly called out the president this week for standing beside Mr. Putin in Helsinki, Finland, and saying he did not believe Russians meddled in the 2016 election, seemed to be pivoting. By conceding that he had misspoken on the issue, they hoped, the president had already wriggled his way out of yet another one.
But intentionally or not, Mr. Trump was set on testing the limits of his ability to move on without consequences.
He took the extraordinary and risky move of inviting Mr. Putin to Washington. Discussions for a meeting in the fall were already underway, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, the White House press secretary, said on Twitter.
Mr. Trump was deploying a familiar tactic: barreling into the next news cycle by supplying the next bit of incendiary programming.
Mr. Gingrich dismissed the ire over Mr. Trump’s news conference this week with Mr. Putin — “For most Americans news conferences in Helsinki are transitory and fleeting,” he wrote in an email. But he did not answer a follow-up message asking him what he thought of Mr. Trump’s invitation to Mr. Putin.
The decision adds to a growing mass of questions surrounding Mr. Trump’s ever-vacillating stance on Russia, leading lawmakers, analysts and supporters to question whether the president, a master of diversion, could be testing his own well-honed instinct to reset the news cycle and move on from consequences.
“Part of Trump’s ability to dodge bullets in the past has rested on his ability to change the subject,” Geoff Garin, a Democratic strategist and pollster. “And this time he’s changing his story instead of changing the subject. And we’re now several days into a very negative narrative on Trump’s conduct in his dealings with Putin.”
If aware of the risks he was taking, Mr. Trump, an obsessive over ratings and approval numbers, seemed unconcerned. Though a majority of Americans disapprove of how he handled himself in Helsinki, 68 percent of Republicans are sticking by him, according to a CBS poll released on Thursday. And a poll conducted by the news site Axios and SurveyMonkey showed that 79 percent of Republicans approved of the meeting.
Mr. Trump has generally met criticism over his behavior with the pugilistic response he has sharpened over his 72 years, first as the child of a wealthy real estate developer, a tabloid fixture, a reality TV star and now from his seat in the Oval Office. It has never stopped him — not for long, anyway.
“I think his willingness to double down in the wake of these events that everyone else sees as catastrophic is because he authentically doesn’t care,” Timothy O’Brien, the author of the 2005 book “TrumpNation: The Art of Being the Donald,” said in an interview. “He’s been insulated his whole life from the impact of his own mistakes.”
But Whit Ayres, a Republican pollster, noted that Mr. Trump’s base of support had endured through Charlottesville and the border separation crisis. “Politics has become so polarized that there is a powerful tendency to rally around our guy,” Mr. Ayres said, “and to defend our guy in the face of criticism from people we don’t like.”
But Mr. Garin, the Democratic strategist, said that by continuing to show a conciliatory side to Mr. Putin, the president was “making it harder and harder for Republicans to defend him with any real conviction.
“And that may signal to voters that there’s something different about this one,” he added.
With his invitation to Mr. Putin, the president again appeared in tune with the Russian president, who, in a foreign policy speech to Russian ambassadors, appeared to be channeling the views of his American counterpart.
“We see that there are forces in the United States that can easily sacrifice Russian-U.S. relations for the sake of their own ambitions,” Mr. Putin said. “Let’s see how the events develop, especially considering that certain forces are trying to disavow the results of the meeting in Helsinki.”
The shared desire of the two leaders for a closer relationship will almost certainly continue to create obstacles for Mr. Trump’s defenders in Congress, who largely expect a harsher stance from the Trump administration — if not the president himself — on Russia.
After Helsinki, Representative Tom Cole, Republican of Oklahoma, was among those who pointed out that the president had made a misstep. In an interview on Thursday, Mr. Cole noted the difference between Mr. Trump’s words and his administration’s policies, and suggested there would only be sweeping concern if those policies changed.
“I separate administration policy, which has actually been pretty tough on the Russians, and presidential sentiment,” Mr. Cole said. “I think the policy is going to stay tough.”
Keywords clouds text link http://alonhatro.com/
|aviatorsgame.com ban nhạc||confirmationbiased.com|
|mariankihogo.com ốp lưng||Giường ngủ triệu gia Ku bet ku casino|
mặt nạ mặt nạ ngủ Mặt nạ môi mặt nạ bùn mặt nạ kem mặt nạ bột mặt nạ tẩy tế bào chết mặt nạ đất sét mặt nạ giấy mặt nạ dưỡng mặt nạ đắp mặt mặt nạ trị mụn
mặt nạ tế bào gốc mặt nạ trị nám tem chống giả
© 2020 US News. All Rights Reserved.